Bithumb Hack ‘Doesn’t Really Change the Fundamentals of Bitcoin’ – Charlie Lee

Bithumb Hack ‘Doesn’t Really Change the Fundamentals of Bitcoin’ – Charlie Lee

Charlie Lee, the founder of Litecoin, went on CNBC’s Fast Money program on Wednesday to discuss the recent hacking of South Korea’s cryptocurrency exchange Bithumb, among other developments in the crypto sphere.

Speaking via telephone, the founder of the world’s fifth-largest cryptocurrency by market cap pointed out that while it is normal for cryptocurrency investors to panic when an exchange gets hacked, such an act does not change the fundamentals of crypto assets.

“Whenever there’s an exchange hack, people get scared and the price drops. It happens all the time. The thing is it doesn’t really change the fundamentals of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies,” said Lee.

Litecoin’s founder then drew parallels to a gold heist at a bank, arguing that — theoretically — it shouldn’t affect the price of the precious metal. Likewise, according to Lee, the hacking of a cryptocurrency exchange shouldn’t have any impact on the fundamentals of crypto assets.

Teething Problems

However, Lee agreed that big strides need to be made with a view of improving the security systems of the exchanges. But Litecoin’s founder was quick to point out that cryptocurrencies are a nascent technology and exchanges are still on the learning path, with improvements constantly being made, even though a lot still remained to be done.

Additionally, Lee said the responsibility of protecting crypto assets shouldn’t wholly lie with exchanges like Bithumb. He argued that investors must be responsible for the security and safety of their digital assets by making wise choices with regards to the exchanges they entrust their coins with. Compared to traditional fiat currencies, investors must bear more responsibility.

With regards to developments in the cryptocurrency sphere, Lee observed that Bitcoin developers had made great strides in the recent past and this included the activation of SegWit (Segregated Witness). Currently, many developers are focused on rolling out the mainnet release of the Lighting Network, which is expected to enhance Bitcoin’s scalability. But while the Lightning Network was primarily developed with Bitcoin in mind, the protocol has been adapted for Litecoin and other networks as well.

Bitcoin Price Lagging its Blockchain’s Technological Advances

Despite the progress made, Lee lamented that the price of the flagship cryptocurrency had fallen by between 60-70% and this was not reflective of recent technological advances. Lee, however, expressed hope that with time the price will adjust to reflect the progress that had been made. Per Lee, the only reason for the current prices was the overwhelmingly bearish sentiment.

When asked how long the bear market would last, Lee could not hazard a guess, noting that having been in the space for between 7-8 years, he has witnessed bear markets which have lasted for a period of between 36 to 48 months and it was therefore impossible to predict whether this particular one will last just as long or bulls will take over soon.

Tether’s Controversy

On the same Fast Money show, Lee also commented on the report by the Freeh, Sporkin & Sullivan LLP law firm that Tether’s USDT tokens are fully backed on a ratio of 1 to 1 by US dollars. He noted that if this were indeed true, the markets would benefit from increased confidence. As evidence, he noted that cryptocurrencies rose slightly after the report came out.

“If they actually do have a USD backing then that means that the run-up is created by real demand and not fake demand. And that’s really good news,” Lee said.

 

Author – Mark Emem

Source – CCN

17 Comments

  1. I was wondering if anyone knows what happened to Dimepiece LA celebrity streetwear brand? I am unable to check out on Dimepiecela site. I have read in Teen Vogue that they were bought out by a UK hedge fund for $50 m. I’ve just bought the Dimepiece Retro Unisex Heavy Blend™ Crewneck Sweatshirt from Ebay and absolutely love it xox

  2. I operate a vape store web directory and we have had a listing from a vape shop in the USA that additionally offers CBD goods. A Month afterwards, PayPal has contacted use to claim that our account has been restricted and have asked us to take away PayPal as a payment solution from our vape shop website directory. We do not offer for sale CBD goods like CBD oil. We only offer advertising and marketing solutions to CBD firms. I have visited Holland & Barrett– the UK’s Major Wellness Store and if you take a close peek, you will see that they sell a reasonably wide-ranging series of CBD products, particularly CBD oil and they also happen to accept PayPal as a settlement solution. It appears that PayPal is administering double standards to many different firms. Because of this limitation, I can no longer take PayPal on my CBD-related web site. This has limited my payment options and currently, I am heavily dependent on Cryptocurrency payments and straightforward bank transfers. I have spoken to a barrister from a Magic Circle law office in London and they stated that what PayPal is undertaking is definitely unlawful and discriminatory as it should be applying an uniform criterion to all companies. I am yet to seek advice from a different attorney from a US law practice in London to see what PayPal’s legal position is in the USA. For the time being, I would be highly appreciative if anyone here at targetdomain could provide me with different payment processors/merchants that work with CBD companies.

  3. I manage a vape shop website directory and we have had a listing from a vape shop in the United States that also advertises CBD product lines. A Calendar month afterwards, PayPal has contacted use to say that our account has been restricted and have requested us to take away PayPal as a payment solution from our vape store submission site. We do not retail CBD product lines such as CBD oil. We simply provide online marketing professional services to CBD companies. I have visited Holland & Barrett– the UK’s Reputable Health Merchant and if you take a good look, you will see that they promote a relatively substantial range of CBD product lines, particularly CBD oil and they also happen to take PayPal as a payment solution. It appears that PayPal is employing contradictory standards to different firms. As a result of this restriction, I can no longer take PayPal on my CBD-related online site. This has restricted my payment possibilities and presently, I am intensely contingent on Cryptocurrency payments and straightforward bank transfers. I have consulted a lawyer from a Magic Circle law practice in London and they said that what PayPal is undertaking is altogether illegal and discriminatory as it ought to be applying a systematic standard to all firms. I am still to consult with an additional legal representative from a US law office in London to see what PayPal’s legal position is in the United States. In the meantime, I would be extremely appreciative if anyone here at targetdomain could offer me with different payment processors/merchants that work with CBD firms.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.