Researchers Say One Whale Caused Bitcoin’s 2017 Bull Run

Whale Caused Bitcoin 2017 Bull Run

Whale Caused Bitcoin 2017 Bull Run

Researchers just made their claims about market manipulation in winter 2017 louder. They are now claiming that a single whale was responsible for Bitcoin’s historic price surge. This was reported by Bloomberg on November 4th 2019.

John M. Griffin and Amin Shams of the universities of Texas and Ohio respectively have updated their previous research, which made the case that market manipulation was allegedly behind Bitcoin’s bull run to an all-time high of $20,000 in December 2017.

Griffin and Sham’s analysis, first published in a research paper in June 2018, argued that transaction patterns on the blockchain suggested Tether had been used to provide price support and manipulate the Bitcoin market:

“Purchases with Tether are timed following market downturns and result in sizable increases in Bitcoin prices. The flow is attributable to one entity, clusters below round prices, induces asymmetric autocorrelations in Bitcoin, and suggests insufficient Tether reserves before month-ends.”

They argued that these patterns supports a “supply-based hypothesis of unbacked digital money inflating cryptocurrency prices.”

In an update to their previous research, they are making their argument stronger, which is set to be formally published in a forthcoming peer-reviewed paper for the Journal of Finance.

The duo are arguing that their analysis of Tether and Bitcoin transactions from March 1st, 2017 through March 31st, 2018 makes their view that a single entity transacting via Tether’s sister firm, crypto exchange Bitfinex  is behind the manipulation stronger.

“This pattern is only present in periods following printing of Tether, driven by a single large account holder, and not observed by other exchanges.”

“Simulations show that these patterns are highly unlikely to be due to chance. This one large player or entity either exhibited clairvoyant market timing or exerted an extremely large price impact on Bitcoin that is not observed in aggregate flows from other smaller traders.”


  1. I operate a vape shop submission site and we have had a posting from a vape store in the United States that additionally markets CBD product lines. A Month later on, PayPal has written to use to say that our account has been restricted and have asked us to take away PayPal as a payment method from our vape store directory site. We do not sell CBD products such as CBD oil. We simply offer online marketing solutions to CBD companies. I have visited Holland & Barrett– the UK’s Reputable Health Store and if you take a close peek, you will witness that they supply a fairly comprehensive range of CBD goods, particularly CBD oil and they also happen to accept PayPal as a settlement method. It emerges that PayPal is administering contradictory standards to many different firms. Because of this stipulation, I can no longer accept PayPal on my CBD-related online site. This has restrained my payment possibilities and now, I am intensely contingent on Cryptocurrency payments and direct bank transfers. I have consulted a lawyer from a Magic Circle law firm in London and they said that what PayPal is doing is definitely against the law and inequitable as it should be applying a consistent criterion to all firms. I am still to seek advice from a different attorney from a US law firm in London to see what PayPal’s legal position is in the USA. Meanwhile, I would be very appreciative if anyone here at targetdomain could offer me with different payment processors/merchants that deal with CBD firms.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.